2. Men and Women in God's Household (1 Timothy 2:1-15)
by Dr. Ralph F. Wilson
Audio
36:19 | Print this Page
Free Email Bible Study
on Colossians after Easter
|

First century Roman couple Paquius
Proculus and his wife, Pompeii, House VII, 2, 6; fresco, National
Archaeological Museum of Naples. Larger
image.
|
1 I
urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving
be made for everyone --
2 for kings and all those in authority, that
we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness.
3 This
is good, and pleases God our Savior,
4 who wants all men to be saved
and to come to a knowledge of the truth.
5 For there is one God and
one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
6 who gave
himself as a ransom for all men -- the testimony given in its proper time.
7
And for this purpose I was appointed a herald and an apostle -- I am
telling the truth, I am not lying -- and a teacher of the true faith to the
Gentiles.
8 I
want men everywhere to lift up holy hands in prayer, without anger or
disputing.
9 I
also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided
hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, 10 but with good deeds,
appropriate for women who profess to worship God.
11 A
woman should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not
permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 13
For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not the
one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. 15 But
women will be saved through childbearing -- if they continue in faith, love and
holiness with propriety. (1 Timothy 2:1-15)
In chapter 1 Paul has outlined his charge to Timothy to stop
the false teachers. Now he begins to spell out the specifics that need to be
corrected, initiated with the phrase: "I urge, then, first of
all...."
We'll get into the details in a moment, but first let's look
at the big picture of chapter 2 where Paul discusses three things that need
correction:
- Exclusivistic attitude towards the lost (2:1-7).
Prayer should be made for everyone and the gospel message be taught to the
Gentiles, implying that the false teachers have been promoting a kind of
Jewish exclusivity both in Ephesus as well as in Crete (Titus 1:10-16).
- Men engaged in angry disputes (2:8). Men should
pray in holiness, not amidst the anger generated by the controversies and
disputes stirred up by the false teachers.
- Out-of-order women propagating false doctrine (2:9-15).
Women should conduct themselves modestly and appropriately in church, not
trying to dominate or set others straight, suggesting that the false
teachers had made inroads into the church through ignorant women
susceptible to their false doctrines (2 Timothy 3:6-7).
As you can guess, we have our hands full working our way
through the 15 verses in this chapter.
Paul begins with the problem of a club mentality. The false
teachers' emphasis on Jewish genealogies and myths tended to leave out the
Gentiles all around them. So Paul instructs:
"1 I urge, then,
first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made
for everyone -- 2 for kings and all those in authority, that we
may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. 3 This
is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4 who wants all men to be
saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth." (2:1-4)
Paul's mention of requests,56
prayers,57
intercession,58
and thanksgiving59
is to emphasize that all kinds of prayers should be made. The object of these
prayers should be universal -- all people. "Everyone" (NIV, NRSV),
"all men" (KJV, NASB) is comprised of two words: pan,
"all" and anthrōpos, "human being, man,
person," the generic term for a person of either sex. There are two
reasons given for these prayers to be made for all:
- Civil order. "Kings and all those in
authority" are the ones who bring civil order, but also can prevent
persecution of Christians, as happened from time to time during Paul's lifetime.
Prayer for rulers also positions the Christian community as submissive
citizens, not as a nest of subversives seeking to overthrow the government
(Romans 13:1-7).
- Salvation of all mankind is God's purpose through
Jesus Christ. God himself is titled Savior for this reason, a common Old
Testament title of God (Psalm 25:5; 27:9; 38:22; 42:11; 43:5; 68:19; 79:9;
Isaiah 45:15; 62:11, etc.) Prayer for the lost pleases God because
he "wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth"
(2:4).
Apparently, the false teachers with their Jewish myths and
genealogies had lost their focus on salvation for the Gentiles, which has been
God's purpose for Israel for centuries (Isaiah 45:22; 49:6; 55:1). God's desire
is our mandate:
"For God so loved the world that
he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not
perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16)
"... He is patient with you, not
wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance." (2
Peter 3:9)
Many of our churches today suffer from this same kind of
navel gazing that the false teachers in Ephesus engaged in. They were so
focused on Jewish genealogies and myths, the minutiae of the Scriptures, that
they forgot the Great Commission, Christ's command to declare the gospel to the
whole world.
A Great Commission mentality is so important that Paul
doesn't let it go at that. He declares:
"5 For there is one
God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6
who gave himself as a ransom for all men -- the testimony given in its proper
time." (2:5-6)
This is a powerful statement. It uses two nouns to describe
Jesus' redemptive role:
- "Mediator" (mesitēs), "one
who mediates between two parties to remove a disagreement or reach a
common goal, mediator, arbitrator."60
The analogy or picture here is two parties that are separated by some
issue. An emissary or negotiator, perhaps a Secretary of State or Prime
Minister, is sent to resolve the problem and bring the parties together.
The word used in the New Testament for this task is
"reconciliation."
"When we were God's enemies, we
were reconciled to him through the death of his Son...." (Romans 5:10)
"God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting
men's sins against them." (2 Corinthians 5:19)
"But now he has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through
death to present you holy in his sight." (Colossians 1:22)
The important thing to realize here
is that our Mediator didn't just talk us into a new stance with God through
endless rounds of negotiation. As Mediator he acted -- which leads us to the
second noun.61
- "Ransom" (antilytron). This is a very
rare word in Greek.62
According to Leon Morris, its meaning does not seem to differ
greatly from the simple lutron ("'price of release, ransom' especially
also the ransom money for the manumission of slaves"63),
but "the preposition anti-emphasizes the thought of
substitution; it is a 'substitute-ransom' that is signified."64
So Jesus acts as the Mediator who brings reconciliation by presenting
himself as a ransom or price of release. Jesus saw this role very clearly,
for he said:
"For even the Son of Man did
not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for
many." (Mark 10:45)
The phrase, "the testimony65
given in its proper time," is difficult, but seems to mean that the time God
will show mercy to all people has now arrived, as witnessed in the death of
Christ for all.66
"And for this purpose I was
appointed a herald and an apostle -- I am telling the truth, I am not lying -- and
a teacher of the true67
faith to the Gentiles." (2:7)
The same three titles used in this verse appear again in 2
Timothy 1:11
- "Herald/preacher" is kēryx,
originally, "an official entrusted with a proclamation, herald,"
then "one who makes public declarations, especially of a transcendent
nature, herald, proclaimer."68
Some pastors may see themselves as professional speakers who are to
entertain, uplift, and inspire. But the basic idea is to be a public
proclaimer of the Gospel.
- "Apostle" (apostolos), see on 1
Timothy 1:1.
- "Teacher" (didaskalos69),
see discussion on 1 Timothy 1:3-5.
Paul has spent several verses underscoring the need for a
renewed evangelistic spirit among the house-churches of Ephesus. Now he turns
to another area that needs correction.
|

Tablet with epitaph of Bessula showing
orante figure. Section V, Museo Pio Cristiano, Vatican, Rome.
|
Due to the controversies stirred up by the false teachers,
the men in the church of Ephesus have been embroiled in disputes. So Paul
writes:
"I want men everywhere to lift
up holy hands in prayer, without anger or disputing." (2:8)
This verse speaks specifically to males in the church, using
the term anēr, "an adult human male, man, husband,"70
in contrast to anthrōpos (used in 2:1, 5), the generic term for
human being of either gender. Men are enjoined to "lift up holy hands in
prayer, without anger or disputing."
He is referring to the ancient Jewish practice of lifting71
of the hands when praying to and blessing God, as well as blessing people.72
Drawings and frescos in the catacombs of Rome, known as orante figures, indicate
that this practice was common in the early church for both men and women.73
But here Paul has the men in mind. They are going through
the motions of prayer while their mouths and hearts are full of anger74
and infighting.75
The controversies of the false teachers have seriously affected the purity of
worship in the church. Centuries earlier Isaiah the prophet had chided the
Israelites:
"When you spread out your hands
in prayer, I will hide my eyes from you; even if you offer many prayers, I will
not listen. Your hands are full of blood; wash and make yourselves clean."
(Isaiah 1:15-16a)
Similarly, Jesus had instructed his disciples that worship
must be pure:
"Therefore, if you are offering
your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something
against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled
to your brother; then come and offer your gift." (Matthew 5:23-24)
Anger and controversy must not intrude on the worship of
God.
Paul has a word for the women in the Ephesian church, as
well.
"9 I also want women
to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or
pearls or expensive clothes, 10 but with good deeds, appropriate for
women who profess to worship God." (2:9-10)
First, Paul states the goal for women's apparel76
in the church: modesty. Let's look at the words he uses:
"Modestly" (NIV, NRSV), "modest
apparel" (KJV) is katastolē, "The basic idea is keeping
something in check, hence the use of this term in the sense of 'reserve,
restraint,'"77
with the meaning of "'propriety, ordered conduct,' then 'clothing' (as a
visible expression of decorum)."78
"Decency" (NIV, cf. NRSV),
"shamefacedness" (KJV) is aidōs. "This term
expresses the opposite of considering or treating something in a common or
ordinary manner; a respect for convention. Modesty."79
"Propriety" (NIV), "suitable
clothing" (NRSV), "sobriety" (KJV), "discreetly" (NASB)
is sōphrosynē, "practice of prudence, good judgment,
moderation, self-control as exercise of care and intelligence appropriate to
circumstances ... decency, chastity,"80
also repeated in verse 15.
In other words, the women (and men, for that matter) aren't
to dress primarily to draw attention to themselves, but are to dress in a way
that projects propriety and decency.
Here Paul gives four examples of what this meant in the
culture of his day: braided hair, gold, pearls, and costly garments. Peter
offers a similar list for women to avoid: "braided hair and the wearing of
gold jewelry and fine clothes" (1 Peter 3:3).
Clothing is an entirely cultural matter, signaling different things in
different ages. In Paul's era these elements were associated with the woman who
desired to draw attention to herself -- whether the prostitute or the
promiscuous woman -- certainly not the image of Christianity that Paul wanted to
project in Ephesus. The other message would have been one of ostentation of rich
wives. A number of contemporary secular writers critiqued the excesses of the
time. But in a situation in which many of the women would have been slaves,
unable to afford such clothing, such an act of pretentious display of wealth
would have been offensive, in poor taste, and accentuated the divide between the
rich and the poor.
Christians have interpreted these verses literally in some
denominations, such as among the early Quakers and the Amish. But few churches
today would refuse to allow girls to braid their hair, women to wear gold
wedding rings, etc. The appropriateness of clothing and jewelry cannot be set
in stone for all time. It must be applied within a particular culture on the
basis of principle, not of law.
In contrast to pretentious attire, Paul counsels that the
women clothe themselves...
"... with good deeds,
appropriate for women who profess to worship God." (2:10)
Rather than outward show, "good works" (KJV, NRSV)
or "good deeds" (NIV) are appropriate, since they represent "the
hidden person of the heart" (1 Peter 3:4).
Good deeds are "appropriate" (NIV) or
"proper" (NRSV)81
for godly women. "Worship" (NIV), "reverence" (NRSV),
"godliness" (KJV) is theosebeia, "reverence for God or
set of beliefs and practices relating to interest in God, piety, godliness."82
This is a different word for godliness than Paul usually employs in the
Pastoral Epistles, eusebia, which is discussed in detail on 1 Timothy
4:7-8.
|
Q4. (1 Timothy 2:9-10) How did women dressing in fancy
clothes threaten to compromise the church's witness in Ephesus? How do we
apply the principle of Paul's directive in twenty-first century churches
without instituting a new legalism?
http://www.joyfulheart.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=838
|
Now we come to one of the most debated passages in current
Western Christianity -- the appropriate role of women in ministry. First, let's
consider the passage itself. Only then will we consider its modern-day
application.
"11 A woman should
learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman
to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 13 For
Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not the one
deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner."
(2:11-14)
It is rather clear that Paul prohibited women from teaching
in public congregational ministry, both in Ephesus and in Corinth (1
Corinthians 14:33-34). False teaching was the central problem in Ephesus, and
apparently part of the problem stemmed from some of the women (1 Timothy 3:11;
2 Timothy 3:6; Titus 2:3-4).
Before we consider how to apply this passage today, let's
examine Paul's directives in this letter by considering the words he uses.
"Woman" (gynē, from which we
get our word "gynecology") can mean both "woman, adult
female" as well as "married woman, wife,"83
the exact connotation to be determined by the context. Here the context seems
to be submission to one's own husband, rather than the submission of all
females to all males.
"Learn" (manthanō) means "to
gain knowledge or skill by instruction, learn."84
This may seem obvious until you realize that in Judaism women were looked down
upon and not really expected to be able to learn what was taught. As a result,
though Jewish women attended synagogue, they wouldn't attend the school that the
boys were expected to attend, thus were most often illiterate. It is noteworthy
that Paul makes no assumption about the inability of women to learn. Paul fully
believes that women can learn, which makes him more progressive than other
Jewish leaders of his time.
"Quietness" (NIV; cf. NASB),
"silence" (KJV, NRSV) is hēsychia, "the state of
saying nothing or very little, silence"85
The word occurs in both verse 11 and verse 12. However, this probably doesn't
mean absolute silence. We see the same word in 1 Corinthians 14:34 in the
context of women interrupting the teaching with questions, which appears to
have been a problem in Corinth. Paul says rather that they should ask their
husbands at home. However, women were allowed to prophecy and pray in the
service (1 Corinthians 11:5), so this is not an absolute silence. Fee suggests
the translation, "in a quiet demeanor."86
In fact, Paul exhorts both men and women in Thessalonica:
"Make it your ambition to lead
a quiet life (hēsychazō), to mind your own business and to
work with your hands, just as we told you...." (1 Thessalonians 4:11)
"Full submission." The word
"submission" (NIV, NRSV), "subjection" (KJV),
"submissiveness" (NASB) is hypotagē, "the state of
submissiveness, subjection, subordination, as opposed to setting oneself up as
controller."87
It is formed from two words: hypo, "under" + tassō,
"to place." It does not mean exactly "obedience;" there is
another word for that. It suggests rather voluntarily placing oneself under
another. Wives, according to the teaching of the apostles, are to be in
voluntary submission to their husbands.
Now let's consider Paul's directive about teaching itself:
"I do not permit a woman to
teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent." (2:12)
"Permit" (NIV, NRSV) or "suffer"
(KJV) is epitrepō, "to allow someone to do something, allow,
permit."88
"Teach" is didaskō, "to
provide instruction in a formal or informal setting, teach."89
Paul isn't speaking here about informal teaching, such as that conducted
privately by Priscilla and Aquilla with Apollos (Acts 18:26)90
or older women instructing younger women in their duties as wives and mothers
(Titus 2:4).91
He is referring to teaching in the main church gatherings.
"Have authority" (NIV, NRSV), "exercise
authority" (NASB), "usurp authority" (KJV) is authenteō,
"to assume a stance of independent authority, give orders to, dictate
to"92
While some contend that this word simply means "to have or exercise
authority" without any negative connotation,93
others (including myself) see this as a word used specifically here (and
nowhere else in the New Testament) to describe a kind of unhealthy pushiness
that is well described by the KJV's translation, "usurp authority."
It is derived from autos, "self" + entea,
"arms," from an earlier usage, "one who with his own hand kills
either others or himself."94
Elsewhere in the New Testament, verbs of exercising
authority come from the word groups based on kyrieuō ("to be
lord of, have dominion over")95
or exousia ("power, authority").96
But this word is different, unique. Paul is making a special point here of the
self-anointed authority being exercised by would-be women teachers. In this
context, Towner believes that the word is likely to have carried "the
negative valuation of inappropriate exercise of authority -- perhaps
'domineer.'"97
"In silence" (hēsychia), repeated from
verse 11 above -- "in a quiet demeanor."98
Paul clearly prohibits women from teaching in the meetings
of the church at Ephesus. To back up his position here, he cites the examples
of Adam and Eve:
"13 For Adam was
formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was
the woman who was deceived and became a sinner." (2:13-14)
Notice that Paul doesn't quote the actual Scripture here.
Rather he cites Adam and Eve as examples or illustrations of the points he is
making. Rather than making his argument from Scripture, he seems to be making a
kind of sermon illustration or allusion to illustrate his point, in the manner
of rabbis of his time. In 2 Timothy, where Paul cites the story of Jannes and
Jambres, according to Jewish tradition the names of the Egyptian magicians who withstood
Moses before Pharaoh (2 Timothy 3:8), he isn't giving an authoritative
exposition of Scripture; he is just citing a well-known story to illustrate his
point.
Paul's first point in our passage seems to be that the wife
should submit to her husband, since the man was formed first. His second point
seems to be that Adam wasn't as open to deception as Eve. Eve was deceived by
the snake, but Adam was persuaded by his wife. In all fairness, of course, Adam
was clearly at least as guilty of sin as Eve.
Paul recalls this same allusion in a letter to the
Corinthian church:
"I am jealous for you with a
godly jealousy. I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might
present you as a pure virgin to him. But I am afraid that just as Eve was
deceived by the serpent's cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from
your sincere and pure devotion to Christ." (2 Corinthians 11:2-3)
The word "deceive" in both 1 Timothy 2:14 and 2
Corinthians 11:2-3 is exapataō, "to cause someone to accept
false ideas about something, deceive, cheat someone."99
In 1 Timothy his point is that Eve was deceived, not Adam. In 2 Corinthians his
point is that the church (as a pure virgin) might be deceived (or seduced) by
Satan's treachery.100
When it suits his argument, Paul can use Eve's deception to
illustrate either the church's deception in general (2 Corinthians) or women's deception
in particular (1 Timothy). For this reason I see this as an illustration from
Scripture, rather than an appeal to the essential nature of all women, that somehow
women in general are more gullible than men. It was certainly true
in Ephesus that the women were being deceived by the false teachers (2 Timothy
3:6), and that's Paul's reference here. Of course, men were being led
astray, also.
Finally, let's look at a verse that is notoriously difficult
to interpret with certainty:
"But women will be saved through
childbearing -- if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety."
(2:15)
The subject is "childbearing," Greek teknogonia,
"the bearing of children."101
The difficulty, of course, is to determine in what sense childbearing saves
a woman. The most popular interpretations are:
- Kept safe through childbirth, the position taken by
the NASB and Weymouth translations. But this is unlikely for several
reasons: It doesn't really fit the context well and, sadly, in real life
good Christian women die in childbirth. Moreover, Paul regularly uses the
word "saved" (sōzō) in terms of redemption and
uses another word for "preserved" (rhyomai, 2 Timothy
3:11; 4:18).
- Saved from the errors of verses 11-12, of lack of
submission and quietness, teaching and usurping authority. But Paul
doesn't use the word "saved" in this manner, especially without
qualifying it carefully.
- Saved through the ultimate Childbirth, that is, through
the birth of Christ Jesus. Since he refers to Adam and Eve, some suggest
that Paul is referring to the so-called "protoevangelium" of
Genesis 3:15 that foreshadows Christ's salvation from Satan's power.
"And I will put enmity
between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush
your head, and you will strike his heel."
But this interpretation seems like
a stretch to me, since Genesis 3:15 wasn't interpreted as referring to the
death of Christ until Irenaeus in the second century.
- Women will live out their salvation in the context of the
typical feminine role, symbolized by childbearing, the context of home
and caring for children. Women's salvation from similar deception (as Eve)
is to be found in her being a model, godly woman, known for her good
works. Women are saved as surely in their calling as wives and mothers as
those who are public leaders in a teaching capacity in the church.
Of course,
Paul does not mean that women can earn their salvation through
childbirth and homemaking!
What makes most sense to me in the context is the fourth
alternative, though many evangelical commentators see the birth of Christ as
the reference.
We've considered carefully what Paul taught about women in
ministry in the church at Ephesus. The real question, however, is this: Does
Paul's instruction in 1 Timothy 2:12 prohibit women from teaching ministries in
the twenty-first century? Were his instructions on this subject based on the
basic nature of man and woman from creation, or were they subject to the
cultural and historical situation in the Mediterranean in the first century?
There is a huge controversy about this question in our day!
And there's no way in the short scope of this chapter that I can consider all
the aspects of the question.
Many books have been written on the subject since the rise
of Christian feminism in the 1970s. As I was reviewing this recently, I found
quite helpful Women in Ministry: Four Views.102
Four evangelicals with different viewpoints present their arguments, which are
then commented on by the other three authors. It helps you see the differences
in approach more clearly.
In brief, the traditional view is that Paul appeals to the
order of creation to back up his assertion of both the headship of the husband
(verse 14a) and the gullibility of women (verse 14b). Therefore, Paul's
prohibition on women teaching and leading in the church (verse 12) is an
eternal command, not culturally conditioned.
Others argue that while submission of wife to husband is
clearly taught in the New Testament, the prohibition of a woman teaching in the
church meetings is culturally conditioned for the following reasons:
- Education. Most women were not taught in the
synagogue schools or well educated in the Greek and Roman educational
systems of the time. Therefore, most were unfit to teach due to lack of
education and training.
- Grasping authority. The word authenteō
in verse 12 carries the negative connotation of "assume a stance of
independent authority, give orders to, dictate to."103
Thus Paul seems to be dealing with a group of "uppity,"
rebellious women in Ephesus who were trying to grasp authority.
- Problems among women. False teachers have made
particular inroads with their teaching with women (2 Timothy 3:6), and it
is this group of women that Paul needs to prevent from spreading inaccuracies
or corrupted teachings.
- Cultural view of women leaders. Women in leadership
positions were considered scandalous in the Greek and Roman cultures of
the time. While the Christian church was trying to establish itself as a
viable force in society, this wasn't the time to buck the trend with women
leaders and freeing slaves, and so create another cause that would
alienate people from the faith unnecessarily. Thus, both slaves and women
were instructed to respect their present social positions, "to give
the enemy no opportunity for slander" (1 Timothy 5:14; 6:1), though
the seeds of their essential equality are clearly sown in the Gospel.
- Essential equality in Jesus. "There is neither
Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in
Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28). This verse is often cited by
egalitarians as support for women teachers. However, I don't think that by
itself this verse is a compelling argument that gender roles should
necessarily be the same.
- Gifting. Some women seem to have been given
extraordinary gifts for teaching and leadership. If the Holy Spirit has
gifted, how can we humans deny the exercise of the gift? Deborah (Judges
4-5) and Huldah (2 Kings 22:14-20) are often cited as examples of
exceptions to the norm of male leadership. Robert Clouse observes that Protestant groups which
have had a stronger emphasis on the Spirit's gifting and calling (such as Methodism,
Quakers, some Baptists, and those in the pietist, holiness, and
Pentecostal movements), have tended to be more open to women in ministry
than others.104
- Consistency. Most traditionalists are not consistent
in their application of New Testament commands. They insist on excluding
women from being teachers based on 1 Timothy 2:12, but are often silent in
their cultural application of (1) women wearing head coverings (1
Corinthians 11:3-16), (2) Christians eating meat with blood in it (Acts
15:20), (3) espousing congregational government, even where the majority
of the voting members are women, thus placing male leaders under female
authority; (4) allowing female missionaries to teach in foreign fields,
but not in churches in their homeland; (5) forbidding any kind of
expression of slavery whatsoever (1 Timothy 6:1-2; Ephesians 6:5-8); and (6)
wearing of braided hair, gold jewelry, pearls, or expensive clothing (1
Timothy 2:9).
As to my own views on this, I believe that Paul teaches
submission of a wife to her husband as an abiding principle, as he does in
Ephesians 5:21-33. However, I believe that because we live in a drastically
different cultural situation from that of the first century Mediterranean
world, women teachers and leaders are appropriate in many, many church situations.
For me the "gifting" argument above is especially compelling.
I know that this is much too brief to cover such a large and
involved topic, but at least we've made a start.
|
Dear friends, since this is a topic in which various
Christ-loving groups disagree, let's be especially careful to state our views
with Christian love and gentleness. Denomination bashing and unloving
attitudes are cause for suspension of Forum privileges.
Q5. (1 Timothy 2:11-15) How should Paul's instructions
about women teaching and leading in the church be applied in the twenty-first
century? How do you support your view?
http://www.joyfulheart.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=839
|
Since Paul's corrective instructions in 1 Timothy 2 ran
against the status quo, I'm sure that a number of people were upset -- the
navel-gazers who neglected evangelism, the men who worshipped while engaged in rancorous
disputes, and the women who were usurping authority in the church. But Paul's
instructions were necessary to help the church at Ephesus become stable and
strong. Taking steps to correct wrong directions and false doctrine are never
easy. But when executed with the help and direction of the Spirit of God, they
can be health-producing to a congregation that has been ill.
Prayer
Father, thank you for apostles and pastors who have to
sometimes bring difficult correction to bring healing to your church. Help us,
Lord, to live out our lives and ministries in ways that are pleasing to you and
bring credit to the Gospel that we proclaim. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen.
Key Verses
"This is good, and pleases God
our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the
truth." (1 Timothy 2:3b-4)
"For there is one God and one
mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave
himself as a ransom for all men -- the testimony given in its proper time."
(1 Timothy 2:5-6)
References